Fed-Batch Cell Culture Process Development: Implementing a Novel Nutrient Additive for a Robust, High-Titer, Scalable Process

View PDF

The fed-batch culture of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells has become well established as the primary method of manufacturing therapeutic recombinant protein products for various disease indications. Fed-batch process-development approaches focus on supporting high–cell-density cultures that are crucial to achieving high product titers but lead to proportionately high nutritional demands. Exhaustion of key nutrients negatively affects cell growth and ability to produce recombinant proteins. To counter that problem, concentrated feeds are added to the culture. Such feeds tend to be difficult to prepare because of limitations in solubility. Often, high or low pH conditions and/or heating steps must be used to dissolve feed components. In many cases, the resulting solutions have a relatively short shelf life (1, 2).

We at Bayer HealthCare implemented a novel, proprietary nutrient additive called GIBCO FunctionMAX TiterEnhancer (Life Technologies, now Thermo Fisher Scientific) in combination with several feeds to enhance CHO cell culture performance. The components were stable and pH-neutral, which contributed to a simple, robust, and good manufacturing practice (GMP)–compliant fed-batch process. Implementing the resulting process has been successfully demonstrated for several different CHO cell lines producing multiple products, all of which have yielded significantly improved titers.

Materials and Methods

Cell Lines: We transfected CHO host cell lines — including CHO-S (Life Technologies, now Thermo Fisher Scientific), CHO-K1SV (Lonza Biologics), and CHO-K1 (Sigma- Aldrich) — with monoclonal antibody (MAb) expression vectors. In total, we tested seven different MAb-producing clonal cell lines.

TABLE 1: List of CHO host cell lines, media, and feed combinations, with the fed-batch vessel type and scale evaluated

TABLE 1: List of CHO host cell lines, media, and feed combinations, with the fed-batch vessel type and scale evaluated

Basal Media and Feeding Solutions: We cultivated CHO-S and CHO-K1SV cells in one of two chemically defined protein free media: CD CHO or CD FortiCHO from Life Technologies (now Thermo Fisher Scientific). We cultured CHO-K1 cells in either ActiCHO (GE HealthCare), HyClone CDM4CHO (Thermo Fisher Scientific, now GE Healthcare), or EX-CELL CD CHO Fusion (Sigma-Aldrich) media. Table 1 lists media and feed combinations for each project. In general, we fed CD CHO cultivated cells with CHO CD EfficientFeed A or B supplements (Life Technologies, now Thermo Fisher Scientific) and fed CD FortiCHO-cultivated cells with CD EfficientFeed C (also Life Technologies, now Thermo Fisher Scientific).

FIGURE 1: Viability cell densities and viabilities of CHO-S cells (Project 1) cultured in CD CHO medium and fed with EF-A, EF-B, or EF-C

FIGURE 1: Viability cell densities and viabilities of CHO-S cells (Project 1) cultured in CD CHO
medium and fed with EF-A, EF-B, or EF-C

In most cases, we added FMTE to those feeds to generate solutions comprising 80% CHO CD EfficientFeed B (EF-B) with 20% FMTE or 70% CD EfficientFeed C (EF-C) with 30% FMTE. For CHO-S and CHO-K1 cells, we supplemented the basal medium with 6 mM glutamine (Life Technologies, now Thermo Fisher Scientific). For project 2, we increased glutamate to 4.5 mM by adding 0.39 g/L glutamate to the CD CHO medium. And when insufficient glucose was provided by the primary feed solutions, we used a glucose solution of 400 g/L to help maintain targeted glucose concentrations.

Shake Flask and Bioreactor Operations: Cells were cultured in shaker flasks or stirred-tank bioreactors (Table 1). We seeded the shake-flask cultures at 0.4 × 106 cells/mL for CHO-K1 and 1 × 106 cells/mL for CHO-S cells in 250-mL shake flasks at an initial working volume of 50 mL. A 5% CO2 humidified incubator maintained cultures at 37 °C, and an orbital shaking platform agitated them at 125 rpm. For CHO-S cells, feeding started on day 3 and repeated every one to three days, with a targeted final glucose concentration at 6–7 g/L. For CHO-K1 cells, feeding started on day 3 and repeated every two to three days, with a targeted final glucose concentration at 7.5–9.0 g/L. We adjusted pH using 6% Na2CO3 (EMD Chemicals) whenever the level fell below 6.9 on the day of sampling.

TABLE 2: Fed-batch operational parameters and methods for projects 2–6.

TABLE 2: Fed-batch operational parameters and methods for projects 2–6.

Cells were also cultivated in bioreactors ranging from 5 L to 1,000 L in capacity (Table 2). The initial working volumes were 65–70% of final volume, with minimal seeding cell densities at ≥0.2 × 106 cells/mL. We used macro-sparging for aeration and dissolved oxygen at 30–40%. Agitation speeds ranged from 30 to 60 rpm, depending on bioreactor volume. To control foaming, we added Antifoam C (Sigma-Aldrich) on demand, prepared as a 100,000-ppm suspension. Depending on the project, initial pH was 6.85–7.10, with temperature at 36.5 °C, and pH and/or temperature were shifted to new set points once cells reached a target density (Table 2). We maintained pH by adding 6% Na2CO3 (EMD Chemicals) when needed.

FIGURE 2: Viable cell densities and titer profiles of Project 2; CHO-K1SV cells were fed with 100% EF-B or a mix of 80% EF-B and 20% FMTE.

FIGURE 2: Viable cell densities and titer profiles of Project 2; CHO-K1SV cells were fed with 100%
EF-B or a mix of 80% EF-B and 20% FMTE.

Where we used EF-B + FMTE, feeding was initiated when cells reached ≥1.0 × 106 cells/mL, with a fixed rate of ~2.5% of final volume each day. For projects using EF-C + FMTE, we initiated feeding once cells reached ≥4.0 × 106 cells/mL, with a fixed rate of ~2.9% of final volume each day. Glucose concentration was targeted at 4.5–5.0 g/L, so we used a glucose solution as a supplement whenever necessary. Finally, we terminated and harvested our cell cultures when cell viability reached ≤70%, generally after 14–17 days of operation.

Analytical Methods: We sampled bioreactors for cell density and viability analysis, using the CEDEX system (Roche Applied Science) to measure nutrient and metabolite concentrations. We determined glucose, lactate, glutamine, and glutamate concentrations using a YSI Model 2700 analyzer (Yellow Springs Instruments). We used a Rapidlab 248 blood gas analyzer (Bayer HealthCare) to measure pH, pCO2, and pO2 and a vapor pressure osmometer (Wescor Inc.) to measure osmolality. And we determined IgG concentrations using a titer assay based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) protein A affinity separation.

Results

Overview of Fed-Batch Operations: Initially we conducted cell culture process development on CHO-S cells using EF-A, EF-B, and EF-C media. For subsequent projects involving the CHO-K1SV cell line, we added FMTE to EF-B or EF-C to help improve cell culture performance. Finally, we tested those feeds on CHO-K1 cells. Another goal was to establish cell culture process parameters such as pH and temperature shifts to be coupled with the EfficientFeed media to optimize cell culture output variables, specifically productivity and product quality.

TABLE 3: Data summary of shaker flask and bioreactor runs of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) host cell lines for seven different MAb projects evaluated

TABLE 3: Data summary of shaker flask and bioreactor runs of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) host cell lines for seven different MAb projects evaluated

Fed-Batch Process with CHO-S Cell Line: Table 3 lists the results from each run of CHO-S cells cultured in 250-mL shaker flasks using CD CHO media with 6 mM glutamine and feeding with EF-A, EF-B, or EF-C. All growth profiles were comparable, with peak viable cell densities (VCDs) of 11–12 × 106 cells/mL (Figure 1). Viabilities dropped drastically for cells fed with EF-A and EF-C after 13–14 days of cultivation, whereas viabilities of those fed with EF-B remained >80%.

We harvested the cells on days 13, 15, and 17 for those fed with EF-A, EF-B, or EF-C, respectively. Final osmolality ranged 315–686 mOsm/kg, with the highest measurement belonging to cells fed with EF-C. Lactate remained <2.0 g/L for all cultures, and it was actually produced and then consumed by cells fed according to the EF-A and EF-B regimen. Of the three feeds, EF-C generated the highest MAb titer of1.8 g/L at harvest, which was close to the satisfactory titer of ≥2.0 g/L. It is important to point out that MAb titers for cells fed with EF-B could have been >1.4 g/L if they had been harvested past 15 days because their viability at harvest was still >80%. So we identified EF-B and EF-C as the two potential feeds for our subsequent MAb development projects.

Fed-Batch Culture of CHO-K1SV Cell Line: Projects 2–6 involved CHO-K1SV cells cultured in bioreactors ranging from 5-L to 1,000-L scales (Table 3). To optimize cell growth and productivity, we developed specific fed-batch process parameters appropriate to the chosen feeding regimens for each individual project. In addition, we introduced the FMTE supplement to these processes, which significantly improved yields and cell performance.

We initially discovered the importance of FMTE in a feed solution in project 2, for which we used a 100% EF-B solution as feed and compared that with the solution of 80% EF-B and 20% FMTE. Without FMTE, the final MAb titer on day 16 was 1.6 g/L, after a peak VCD of 19.7 × 106 cells/mL. In the culture with FMTE included as part of the feed regimen, peak VCD was 23.7 × 106 cells/mL, with a final MAb titer of 3.0 g/L on day 17.

FIGURE 3: Titer, osmolality, base addition, and lactate profiles for project 2 show possible differences caused by the presence or absence of pH shift in the fed-batch process.

FIGURE 3: Titer, osmolality, base addition, and lactate profiles for project 2 show possible
differences caused by the presence or absence of pH shift in the fed-batch process.

We had to develop specific process parameters for project 2, particularly for implementation of pH shift at appropriate times. Figure 3 shows the two different lactate profiles from project 2. Run 1 was cultivated at pH 6.8 throughout the cell culture period, whereas run 2 was cultivated initially at 6.8 but pH was shifted to 7.0 when feeding started (at ~1.5 × 106 cells/mL). When cells began to consume lactate and increase their CO2 output, we shifted the pH back to 7.0 again. That pH shift lowered base addition as well as osmolality, leading to longer and healthier campaigns producing higher MAb titers.

Using the final fed-batch process, we ran project 2 at various bioreactor scales ranging from 5 L to 1,000 L to demonstrate consistencies at different scales (Table 3). Peak VCD was 22–24 × 106 cells/mL, and peak lactate was 1.5–1.7 g/L, with all runs demonstrating lactate consumption profiles. Osmolality remained low throughout these campaigns, and final osmolality values were <300 mOsm/kg. Final MAb titers at harvest were >2.0 g/L, with highest titer of 3.0 g/L achieved at the 5-L scale.

Projects 3–6 also produced desirable growth and productivity profiles under the developed fed-batch processes and feeding regimen (Table 3). For project 3, which used the same 80%/20% regimen as project 2, we implemented pH and temperature shifts at specific time points in the final cell culture process. Final MAb titers for project 3 were between 4.0 and 5.4 g/L, and lactate remained below 2.5 g/L, demonstrated lactate-consumption characteristics (Table 3). Project 6 also used the same feed regimen as project 2, but the specific clone used did not require the pH shift. Nonetheless, MAb titers reached 3.7 g/L at harvest, and those cells also consumed lactate after reaching a peak lactate level <2.0 g/L, in addition to low osmolalities similar to those seen in projects 2 and 3 (Table 3).

FIGURE 4: Viable cell density, viability, and titer profiles for project 5 show possible differences caused by the presence or absence of temperature shift in the fed-batch process.

FIGURE 4: Viable cell density, viability, and titer profiles for project 5 show possible differences caused by the presence or absence of temperature shift in the fed-batch process.

For project 5, we used a mix of EF-C and FMTE mix and incorporated a temperature shift into the fed-batch process. Figure 4 shows growth and titer profiles that resulted under temperature and no temperature shift. As a result of the temperature shift, peak VCD was lower but the cell culture duration was prolonged to 17 days, so titers increased to 4.4 g/L. We also ran project 5 at the 200-L and 1,000-L scales, which also achieved titers >3.0 g/L (Table 3). The 200-L peak VCD was lower than that of the 5-L and 1,000-L scales because the 200-L temperature shift happened at ~8.0 × 106 cells/mL rather than at 10.0 × 106 cells/mL in the 1,000-L culture. Nevertheless, lactate and osmolality results remained relatively similar across all three scales (Table 3).

Fed-Batch Culture of CHO-K1 Cell Line: Table 3 lists results from CHO-K1 cells fed with mixes of EF-A, EF-B, EF-C, and FMTE and shows the three best medium and feed combinations discussed herein. The mix of ActiCHO and EF-C/FMTE yielded a final MAb titer of 3.5 g/L by day 14 of cultivation. Peak VCD was 9.6 × 106 cells/mL, and peak lactate reached only 1.4 g/L. The mix of CDM4CHO medium and EF-C/ FMTE generated a MAb titer of 5.3 g/L at day 19 of cultivation. The mix of EX-CELL CD CHO Fusion medium and EF-A/EF-B/FMTE yielded final MAb titers of 4.8 g/L by day 21 of cultivation. Similar to the ActiCHO culture, those runs also had peak VCDs around 9 × 106 cell/mL and low lactate profiles throughout.

Discussion

Benefits of Fed-Batch Strategy Using FMTE: Process development work involving three different CHO cell lines and seven different antibody projects has resulted in an effective fed-batch platform process with many attractive features, including simplicity in preparation and administration of feeds, especially using the novel FMTE nutrient additive. Feeds are added continuously at a fixed flow rate, with no additional bolus feeds required during the culture period. In addition, components dissolve easily during preparation (without the need for heating or cooling), and a neutral pH is maintained throughout that process. The feeds remain stable for over three months in their liquid form, and we believe that the overall cost of raw materials is lower than for other fed-batch processes currently used in the industry.

Another benefit of our new platform process is its ability to yield desirable process outputs. For the seven different projects discussed herein, low lactate and low osmolality provided a less stressful culture environment for cultured cells, allowing for sustained high viabilities and extended culture length — which in turn facilitated higher MAb titers (3–5). Overall, we obtained MAb titers of >2.0 g/L, with 5.3 g/L being the highest measured. These outcomes demonstrate the flexibility of pairing the identified feeds with multiple media types to generate satisfactory results.

Process Refinements for Better Performance: Media and feed components are the main elements of our fed-batch process, but we needed to refine that process for it to achieve optimal performance. For example, we established specific process parameters for projects 2–6, including pH and temperature shifts at appropriate times during cultivation. Without a pH shift in project 2, we observed inconsistent cell culture profiles (particularity in lactate and MAb production) between cultures despite the same feed and media being used for all runs. Adding a temperature shift in projects 3 and 5 prolonged cultivation duration to allow for higher MAb titer concentrations at harvest. Although not discussed in detail herein, we increased glutamate in the basal medium for project 2 because it would be completely depleted during the campaign without that additional glutamate supply. Combining these process refinements with the FMTE supplement greatly improved the effectiveness of our media and feed components on the cell culture performance of antibody-producing CHO cells.

Scalable and Robust Performance for Clinical Manufacturing: Adoption of our new platform process provided for a simple and GMP-friendly fed-batch process. The reduced number of raw materials involved simplified raw-material inspection needs and reduced the time and efforts required to bring antibody projects to a clinical-manufacturing level. Project 2 required 13 months from clone selection to GMP drug-substance generation and was the first project to be evaluated on this new platform process. Using the fully established process, project 5 reached GMP drug substance within a year, starting from clone selection. Both projects showed consistent and robust cell culture performance in pilot-scale bioreactors (1,000 L) compared with the 5-L, 10-L, and 200-L bioreactors. Clinical manufacturing campaigns involving projects 2 and 5 demonstrated that the new platform process is scalable with minimal process deviations. So this is a highly robust and GMP-friendly platform that enables production of multiple-kilogram quantities of MAb drug substance for clinical trials.

A New Platform

Our fed-batch platform process was extensively developed involving three different CHO host cell lines and seven different projects, with resulting data demonstrating the effectiveness and benefits of the FunctionMAX TiterEnhancer nutrient additive for fed-batch cultivation of MAb-producing CHO cells. By implementing the new platform process, we easily achieved high productivities in addition to other desirable process attributes. The ease of operation and simplicity of the platform process enables the rapid transfer of antibody projects into clinical manufacturing. It has been proven to be a robust, reproducible, and GMP-friendly fed-batch process.

Acknowledgments

We thank our colleagues in Global Biologics Development groups at Bayer HealthCare for their contributions.

References

1 Hackera DL, De Jesus M, Wurm FM. 25 Years of Recombinant Proteins from Reactor-Grown Cells: Where Do We Go from Here? Biotechnol. Adv. 27(6) 2009: 1023–1027.

2 Barrett SL, et al. Attaining Next-Level Titers in CHO Fed-Batch Cultures. BioProcess Int. 10(10) 2012: 56–62.

3 Li J, et al. Feeding Lactate for CHO Cell Culture Processes: Impact on Culture Metabolism and Performance. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109, 2012: 1173–1186.

4 Schmelzer AE, Miller WM. Hyperosmotic Stress and Elevated pCO2 Alter Monoclonal Antibody Charge Distribution and Monosaccharide Content. Biotechnol. Progr. 18, 2002: 346–353.

5 Zhu MM, et al. Effects of Elevated pCO2 and Osmolality on Growth of CHO Cells and Production of Antibody-Fusion Protein B1: A Case Study. Biotechnol. Progr. 21, 2005: 70–77.

Meile Liu is a process development scientist, Roy Kimura is a senior staff development scientist, Karthik Jayapal was a staff development scientist (now deputy director of cell culture at Sanofi Pasteur), and corresponding author Paul Wu is director of upstream development in cell culture development (global biological development) at Bayer HealthCare, 800 Dwight Way, Berkeley, CA 94710. Mark Trautwein is a senior research scientist in cell and protein sciences; Anke Mayer-Bartschmid is a senior scientist, and Alexander Jockwer is head of upstream development (Global Biological Development) at Bayer HealthCare, Friedrich-Ebert-Straβe 217-475, 42117 Wuppertal, Germany. Shawn Barrett is associate director of bioproduction R&D at Thermo Fisher Scientific, 3175 Staley Road, Grand Island, NY, 14072, USA.

 

One thought on “Fed-Batch Cell Culture Process Development: Implementing a Novel Nutrient Additive for a Robust, High-Titer, Scalable Process

Leave a Reply